Colm Tóibín, Long Island (Picador, 2024). Library copy
Nothing much happens in this novel set in Colm Tóibín’s familiar Irish location of Enniscorthy. That’s not entirely true – there are significant developments, of course: a husband’s infidelity; former lovers meet again 25 years after one of them was left broken-hearted when the other returned home to Brooklyn, and both face a dilemma at the prospect of reviving that former love.
In his 2009 novel Brooklyn Eilis emigrated to America in part to escape the stifling, intrusive community of her Irish home town. In New York she married an Italian-American man, then returned to Enniscorthy for her sister’s funeral. That’s when she had to confront her dilemma: return to her (apparently) happy married life in Brooklyn after the funeral, or stay with her Irish ex-lover.
In a beautifully restrained narrative Tóibín portrayed the inner lives of these conflicted characters, struggling to cope with their opposing impulses, most of which involve heart versus head: which choice will lead to the most happiness, least pain? His focus in the novel was on what the author in an interview called ‘submerged emotions’. Characters feel deeply, they hurt inside, and they hurt others, but we rarely see this articulated, either in narrative exposition or in dialogue.
There’s a lot of dialogue, and it flows on the page with the natural ease of a river. But the important stuff is usually what isn’t said. There are a lot of silences when the characters are together.
That was the main source of Tóibín’s capacity for engaging his reader in what was such an immersive, fulfilling experience in Brooklyn. He did it again in Nora Webster (2014 – link to my post on this novel HERE); Nora pops up in Long Island as well.
He pulls this off again here. Take this example, chosen pretty much at random: One morning, having just woken up in her mother’s house in Ireland, Eilis:
…tried to think what was making her dread the day to come and then she realized that it was nothing. She was in her mother’s house, that was all.
There’s the tension between extreme opposites of emotion and experience: ‘dread’ at one end of the spectrum, and ‘nothing’ at the other. Tóibín doesn’t explain or analyse his characters’ thoughts, their submerged emotions – they remain largely unstated. We just glimpse bits of them that break the surface of the narrative, like tiny islands of solidity.
So if it worked so well in those earlier, linked novels, why is it less successful in Long Island? Tóibín said in an interview I saw on YouTube that he wouldn’t normally end a novel conclusively: he likes to leave the reader to figure out what happens to his characters after the final page. Similarly, he didn’t consider Long Island to be a sequel to Brooklyn; 25 years have passed, and his central characters have changed, developed – particularly in Eilis’s case. She’s less passive, more confident and perceptive, he said.
I can’t altogether accept that assertion. My problem with Long Island, which is as always with Tóibín a beautifully written, highly rewarding read (at one level), is that it’s too much a rerun of the earlier novel. Similar set of events leading to a similar pattern of dilemmas for the main characters.
When I’d finished I felt disappointed. I didn’t think these characters had developed much at all; the storyline was reprised and they were still stuck in the same quandary. The mix of conflict and inertia first time round was part of the unique tone of Brooklyn; this second time, it seemed to me just frustrating.
I wouldn’t advise readers who enjoyed Brooklyn to give Long Island a miss, however. Even a slightly less successful novel by Colm Tóibín is still better than most contemporary fiction.