What would I have done?

Jonathan Freedland, The Traitors Circle: the rebels against the Nazis and the spy who betrayed them. John Murray hardback 2025. 456 pp (incl. nearly 100 pp. of notes).

I was given this book for Christmas. It’s a grim but fascinating account that’s tersely summed up in the title.

From 1933 until the height of WWII, brave groups (circles) of German anti-fascists met in secret and shared dissident views, often at tea-party salons. Most of them were from the old Weimar establishment, or minor aristocrats who abhorred the increasingly brutal and repressive government of Hitler and the collusion of what seemed to be the majority of the German people who treated him as little less than a god.

Some of these rebels did more than just talk – they took direct action, giving shelter to fleeing Jews, or helping them find safe hiding places, or even guiding them along escape routes to evade the terrible fate so many of their fellows.

Freedland, a Guardian journalist whose Jewish family suffered bereavement as a consequence of the V2 bombing campaign against London towards the end of the war, has clearly researched this topic extensively. The treachery of the spy mentioned in the subtitle, who wormed his way into one of these circles, resulted in the gruesome executions of many of those he identified to the Gestapo. The author traces in great detail the fates of a number of the most prominent, brave rebels.

The final sections portray the reversal of fortunes after the war. The downfall of the Hitler regime led to the famous investigations and trials of many of the most prominent Nazis who had been responsible for the holocaust and the vicious treatment of those who had dared to defy them.

Sadly, some of the most culpable managed to avoid retribution.

The question books like this always raise, as Freedland suggests in the note at the start, is: what would I have done if I had been a German citizen in the thirties? We live in a time of frightening instability and polarised attitudes to the rule-based order that has prevailed for most of the decades following the cold war. Every day there are new stories about the capacity for the American president to hasten what increasingly looks like the downfall of liberal democracy in the West.

That same question arises in slightly different form today: what can we do – if anything? All the usual supports for democracy, like the rule of law, mutual respect among the allied western countries, NATO solidarity, and so on, are regularly attacked and demolished by DT and his obsequious acolytes. It used to seem an exaggeration to liken the regime he is creating to that of 1930s Germany, but now I’m not so sure.

It seems churlish to end this post on a slightly negative note, but here goes. Freedland’s prose style is too much like that of a minor thriller writer. Too many chapters end on a supposedly chilling cliffhanger. One selected at random from early in the book is ‘among them was the man who would become her biggest secret’. Others are along the lines of “little did they know that he was not what he seemed”, or ‘proof of [danger] came sooner than anyone would have expected – with the tea-party’s first death’ (p. 198). This is such a powerful, chilling and salutary story, it doesn’t need this kind of pulp-fiction prose.

A Pure Woman. Lloyd Jones, Hand Me Down World

Lloyd Jones, Hand Me Down World. John Murray, 2011. First published in New Zealand in 2010.

This is a love story and a ghost story.

Jones HMDWorld coverIt tells, in differing, often conflicting versions and recensions – as in the Akutagawa story on which the Kurosawa film ‘Rashomon’ was based – how a young African woman has no real identity, no substance in the eyes of Europeans she meets; even her name used later in the novel is the one she stole from a woman she encounters in Italy, with tragic consequences: Ines, one form of the name Agnes – which significantly derives from the Greek for ‘pure’ or ‘holy’. Ines, like Tess, is a Pure Woman.

The first sections of this gripping novel by the New Zealander Lloyd Jones (who was shortlisted for the Booker for Mister Pip in 2007) consist of the multiple accounts from those who knew her at the start of her quest to reach Berlin. The first is a co-worker at a swanky tourist hotel on the Arabian Sea patronised mostly by white Europeans, where it was a prerequisite for the staff that they shed all vestiges of past or identity: as human beings they were as substanceless as ghosts. Even this colleague/friend who knew her for some years never learned her name, where she came from in Africa, or even her birthday:

When we spoke of home we spoke of somewhere in the past. We might be from different countries but the world we came into contained the same clutter and dazzling light. All the same traps were set for us.

Here the language conveys some of the register of a non-native speaker of English, shot through with the poetic sensibility of Lloyd the artificer who filters these forensic, mediated voices of testimony through his own artist’s sensibility to present them to us. It’s an astonishingly accomplished act of multiple ventriloquism and narrative dexterity and ingenuity. In this quotation he conveys how, for women like these, the tourist resort and its hotel is a playground for the privileged guests, but dangerous for them if they forget their place, to be invisible:

You have to leave your past in order to become hotel staff…you had to be like the palms and the sea, pleasing to the eye. We must not take up space but be there whenever a guest needed us.

Lloyd’s is the heartbreakingly familiar one to those of us in affluent Europe of the desperate people risking their lives in unseaworthy boats to make the dangerous crossing to southern Italy from north Africa. Even if the boats survive the trip, unscrupulous traffickers, for whom the people they convey are just ‘merchandise’ or cargo, are likely, as they do to Ines, to throw them overboard miles from the shore and leave them to drown. Most can’t swim; fortunately, Ines can, and she makes it to land, there to continue her quest.

For unlike the other boat people, she isn’t trying to escape from economic hardship or political turmoil; she is searching for what has been stolen from her and taken to Europe, to Berlin – that city of ghosts, bullet-scarred memorials, squares haunted by the book-burning Nazis, and secret photos of atrocities committed by Berliners in their shameful past.

These early polyvocal fragments take on new significance in the second part of the novel when the perspective shifts and we learn why these narrators are testifying to Ines’ progress towards her goal. Then we realise how partial, unreliable, redacted or just downright untrue they were. Only near the end do we hear Ines’ own voice; like many women (see my recent post on The Silence of the Girls) and migrants, she is for most people both invisible and mute.

Many of those she encounters on her journey and in Berlin show her kindness and sympathy; others exploit her and fail to see beyond the colour of her skin or her gender. When she encounters a group of Italian hunters in the border mountains, for example, it’s notable that it’s the American among them who alone resists giving her money to help her on her way; back home, he says, she’d be seen as ‘an illegal, an alien’. The Italian narrator of this section is clearly horrified at this lack of humanity. This is 2010, pre-Trump.

In Ch. 9 a pastor ‘of the Ibo order’ who works at a refuge for African migrants gives his testimony to the ‘inspector’ who is gathering these witness statements about Ines. He laughs at the officer because

you come here to Berlin to ask a pastor, a black man, about ghosts. Presumably you mean white ghosts…For example, there are ghosts we do not see, the spooky ghosts, the ghosts of the American imagination…These are the ones small children worry are lying beneath their beds at night.

The other kind, the ‘real ones’, he says, ‘are simply the ones whom we choose not to see.’ African migrants like Ines fall into this category of the unseen. At first they have names. Then they don’t: ‘Soon they will turn into ghosts.’ Many are sent back to Libya to a hellish ‘detention centre’ where they ‘turn into ghosts’ and go mad or wander into the desert to die.

As tens of thousands of African migrants blow like sand across the sea, ‘fortress Europe’ nails down the shutters, says the pastor:

It pretends. It pretends like the child afraid of the ghost under the bed.

Lloyd is too astute an artist, however, to turn his compelling love story/quest into a diatribe or message-heavy polemic; this is the only place where the narrative preaches, and it’s because the speaker is a preacher who has good cause to do so. But his message lingers through the rest of the story like fading bells of city churches as one passes through a cemetery on the way to Alexanderplatz.

Lisa Hill at her blog recommended Lloyd’s most recent novel, but suggested I start with this one. She has excellent taste: it’s a terrific novel, and one I feel sure will haunt whoever reads it as it does me. Her post of 2010 examines another theme in the novel: the duality or multiplicity of possibilities or perspectives in interpreting alternative truths and their ‘dual capacities’ – hence the prominence in the narrative of discussions of amphibious lungfish, hermaphrodite snails, people of mixed ethnicity, etc. It’s possible to discern conflicting or opposing ‘truths’ in events or entities that seem irreconcilable, but which can be held simultaneously. It’s a subtle reading that I can’t do justice to in a few words here, for I’ve already gone on too long…I commend her post to you, as I do this remarkable novel. Thanks for the recommendation, Lisa.