Tessa Hadley, Late in the Day, Jonathan Cape hb 2019, 280 pp.
Two couples negotiate bereavement, infidelity and parenting: the basis of many if not most novels. The ‘novel’ part is what the writer does with this familiar basis to raise it above the mundane and predictably ordinary. Tessa Hadley tries perhaps a bit too hard to do this with her quartet of self-absorbed middle-class characters, and the result isn’t entirely satisfactory – but there are some redeeming features.
The novel begins with the bereavement I mentioned, and what follows is an account of the fallout this causes in the three survivors who were closest to the deceased. Fissures in their relationships deepen as a consequence, and the uneasy equilibrium of their lives is disturbed irretrievably.
A series of flashbacks gives us the back story to all this. One of the women, Christine, has a record of not finishing things: a PhD that was abandoned, a potential career as an artist given up, perhaps temporarily, because of self-doubt and an unsupportively critical husband. Her best friend Lydia is vain and selfish, and all of these factors play a part in the tumultuous after effects of the bereavement.
Tessa Hadley pulls all this together skilfully and with some well-crafted prose. It’s just that I couldn’t really care too much what happens to these characters through the ill-judged or self-serving choices that they make.
There are some fine passages of description of the setting (mostly London – and its growing population of raucous parakeets), and interesting details about several of the characters’ attempts to produce works of art in various media. There’s this, for example, about Zachary, whose wealthy parents were ‘enthusiastic patrons of the arts’ and were able to provide useful connections. Zachary was later the owner of an art gallery, but in his younger days ‘was struggling with a novel’ and the creation of ‘light-box installations’ which had attracted the attention of editors and galleries (thanks to those influential parents and his own ‘resilient good luck and his charm’) – but like Christine, mentioned above, ‘he hadn’t finished anything yet’:
[His friend Alex] didn’t think Zachary had the necessary cruelty that made an artist, or the incompleteness in himself. He was too rounded and too hopeful. His work was derived from his enthusiasm for the arts, which was all upside down. But then Alex’s ideas about an artist’s life were based naturally on his own father, whose gifts [as a novelist] had been so bitterly unfulfilled.
This passage says a lot ostensibly about Zachary and his shortcomings, but also about Alex, through whose consciousness this is filtered.
Passages of this calibre do appear elsewhere in the novel, but they serve to highlight the less inspiring majority of the narrative.
I was much less impressed by the other Tessa Hadley novel I’ve posted about here: The Party. There’s a brief note on it from a couple of years ago HERE.

